The British Raj: Unraveling Britain's Policy Towards the Indian National Congress

The British Raj: Unraveling Britain's Policy Towards the Indian National Congress

The British Raj: Unraveling Britain's Policy Towards the Indian National Congress

Chapter 1: Divide and Rule: The British Strategy for Indian Control

The British colonial rule in India, which lasted for nearly two centuries, was marked by a deliberate strategy to divide and rule the Indian population. This policy was designed to maintain British control over India by exploiting the existing religious, cultural, and social divisions within the Indian society.

The historical background of British colonial rule in India dates back to the early 18th century when the East India Company, a British trading company, established its foothold in India. Over time, the company's influence expanded, and it eventually became the de facto ruler of India. The British government formally took over the administration of India in 1858, following the Indian Rebellion of 1857.

The implementation of the Divide-and-Rule policy was a deliberate attempt by the British to maintain their control over India. The policy was based on the principle of creating divisions among the Indian population, thereby preventing them from uniting against the British rule. The British exploited the existing religious and cultural differences between Hindus and Muslims, and also created new divisions by introducing a system of separate electorates for different communities.

The impact of this policy on Indian society and politics was significant. It led to the creation of separate identities for Hindus and Muslims, which eventually culminated in the partition of India in 1947. The policy also led to the suppression of Indian nationalism, as the British used the divisions to their advantage to maintain their control over India.

Chapter 2: The Morley-Minto Reforms: A Tactic for British Domination

The Morley-Minto Reforms, introduced in 1909, were a significant development in the British policy towards India. The reforms were named after the then Secretary of State for India, John Morley, and the Viceroy of India, Lord Minto. The reforms were designed to provide a limited form of self-government to Indians, while maintaining British control over the country.

The motivations behind the reforms were twofold. Firstly, the British government wanted to placate the growing demand for self-government in India, which was being led by the Indian National Congress. Secondly, the reforms were designed to create a sense of participation among Indians in the governance of the country, thereby reducing the likelihood of widespread unrest and opposition to British rule.

The response of the Indian National Congress to the reforms was lukewarm. While the Congress welcomed the introduction of a limited form of self-government, it was critical of the reforms for not going far enough in granting autonomy to Indians. The Congress also criticized the reforms for perpetuating the system of separate electorates, which it saw as a deliberate attempt to divide the Indian population.

The limitations of the reforms were evident in their failure to address the growing demand for self-government in India. The reforms did not provide for any significant transfer of power to Indians, and the British government continued to maintain control over key areas of governance, including defense, foreign affairs, and finance.

Chapter 3: The Rise of Indian Nationalism: INC's Initial Response

The Indian National Congress, founded in 1885, was the first organized expression of Indian nationalism. The Congress was formed by a group of Indian intellectuals, including Dadabhai Naoroji, A.O. Hume, and Gopal Krishna Gokhale, who were inspired by the ideals of liberty, equality, and democracy.

The early years of the Congress were marked by a sense of moderation and cooperation with the British government. The Congress leaders believed that the British government would eventually grant self-government to Indians, and they focused on building a mass movement to pressure the government to introduce reforms.

The reaction of the INC to British policies was initially one of cooperation and petitioning. The Congress leaders believed that by working with the British government, they could persuade it to introduce reforms that would benefit Indians. However, as the years went by, the Congress became increasingly disillusioned with the British government's failure to respond to its demands.

The role of key leaders like Dadabhai Naoroji, A.O. Hume, and Gopal Krishna Gokhale was significant in shaping the early years of the Congress. These leaders played a crucial role in building the Congress into a mass movement, and they were instrumental in articulating the demands of Indians for self-government.

Chapter 4: Protests and Civil Disobedience: INC's Fight for Independence

The Indian independence movement, led by the Indian National Congress, was marked by a series of protests and civil disobedience campaigns. These campaigns were designed to pressure the British government to grant independence to India, and they played a crucial role in eventually forcing the British to leave India.

The role of protests and civil disobedience in the Indian independence movement was significant. These campaigns were led by Mahatma Gandhi, who believed that non-violent resistance was the most effective way to challenge British rule. The campaigns were marked by widespread participation, with millions of Indians taking part in protests, boycotts, and civil disobedience movements.

The impact of these protests on British control and international perception was significant. The British government was forced to respond to the protests, and it eventually introduced a series of reforms that granted greater autonomy to Indians. The protests also drew international attention to the Indian independence movement, and they helped to build support for India's cause around the world.

Chapter 5: The Effectiveness of British Policies: A Closer Look

The effectiveness of British policies in maintaining control over India is a matter of debate among historians. While the British government was able to maintain its control over India for nearly two centuries, the policies it employed were often brutal and repressive.

The Divide-and-Rule strategy, which was a cornerstone of British policy in India, was successful in preventing Indians from uniting against British rule. However, the strategy also had a long-term impact on Indian society, leading to the creation of separate identities for Hindus and Muslims.

The Morley-Minto Reforms, which were introduced in 1909, were a limited success. While they provided a limited form of self-government to Indians, they did not go far enough in granting autonomy to Indians. The reforms also perpetuated the system of separate electorates, which was a deliberate attempt to divide the Indian population.

Chapter 6: Evolution of British Attitudes: From Domination to Recognition

The British government's attitude towards Indian independence underwent a significant shift over the years. From a policy of domination and control, the British government eventually came to recognize India's right to independence.

The impact of World War I and II on British perceptions of Indian nationalism was significant. The wars led to a shift in the global balance of power, and the British government was forced to re-evaluate its relationship with India. The government eventually came to recognize that it could no longer maintain its control over India through force, and it began to explore ways of granting independence to India.

The role of key figures like Lord Curzon, Lord Irwin, and Lord Mountbatten was significant in shaping British attitudes towards Indian independence. These leaders played a crucial role in persuading the British government to grant independence to India, and they were instrumental in negotiating the terms of India's independence.

Chapter 7: Legacy and Lessons: Britain's Policy Towards INC

The legacy of British policies towards the Indian National Congress is complex and multifaceted. While the policies were designed to maintain British control over India, they also had a long-term impact on Indian society and politics.

The lessons learned from the strategies employed by the British government are significant. The policies demonstrate the importance of understanding the complexities of Indian society and politics, and the need for a nuanced approach to governance.

The significance of the Indian National Congress in shaping India's post-independence trajectory is undeniable. The Congress played a crucial role in building a modern, democratic India, and its legacy continues to shape Indian politics today.

Chapter 8: Conclusion: Unraveling Britain's Policy Towards the Indian National Congress

In conclusion, Britain's policy towards the Indian National Congress was marked by a deliberate strategy to divide and rule India. The policy was designed to maintain British control over India, but it ultimately failed to achieve its objectives.

The book has provided a comprehensive analysis of the dynamics between the British government and the Indian National Congress. It has demonstrated the significance of understanding the complexities of Indian society and politics, and the need for a nuanced approach to governance.

The lessons learned from the strategies employed by the British government are significant, and they continue to shape Indian politics today. The book has also highlighted the importance of recognizing the legacy of British policies towards India, and the need for a more nuanced understanding of India's complex history.

stories with afzal

Truth, indeed, is not impartial

Follow @storywithafzal

Contact:

Page: Upojila gate, Narsingdi, Bangladesh

Phone: 01726-634656

Email: advafzalhosen@gmail.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ভাড়াটিয়া-ভাড়াদার আইনের জটিলতা পার হওয়া: ভাড়াটিয়াদের জন্য একটি গাইড

একটি ভিত্তিহীন গুজব উড়িয়ে দেওয়া: বাংলাদেশী সাংবাদিকদের ফ্রেঞ্চ ভিসা প্রত্যাখ্যান করা হয়নি৷

অধ্যায় 2: বাংলায় ব্রিটিশ ঔপনিবেশিক শাসন